![]() The location of the pin falls between a high-RG and low-RG axis orientation which is considerably unstable. It truly is the best of both worlds connecting early roll in company with backend entry angle. At 4″ from the PAP, this pin distance puts the core in a position that’s suitable for most house and challenge conditions. With a subtle change in hand position or speed I can navigate to just about anywhere on the lane with this layout and still get the ball to go through the pins the way I need it to. On the medium 39′ Tungsten pattern, this layout shines. Instability in core orientation is what makes a ball hook in the first place, but knowing when and where to use such flare potential remains the bowler’s responsibility to determine.Ī 4 x 5 x 1.5 Parallax is a versatile layout that provides a player whose speed and rev rate match an all-around functional ball able to be used on a variety of conditions. The longer pins simply created too much flare and volatility which made it problematic in the effort to keep them on the right side of the headpin on this short, flatter pattern. ![]() But if urethane is not your “thing”, then consider a shorter pin-to-PAP layout to help control those more compact patterns when the ball tries to dart sideways off the breakpoint.Īt just over 4° of entry angle, the short pin was able to control the pocket much better than the other two test balls despite being thrown at the same set down and launch angle. The 5″ PSA-to-PAP distance ensures sufficient entry angle and the 1.5″ pin buffer provides ample roll through the pins, but because it’s still a very stable overall core position, this layout may struggle on lengthier patterns. At just 37′ and a 4.77:1 ratio, Kegel’s Broadway V2 is short with not much hold. The 2 x 5 x 1.5 shined on the shorter pattern, naturally. This type of layout rolls early and smooths out the breakpoint shape smoothness equals predictability here. The lower the RG orientation, the less resistant the ball will be to changing direction down lane. In this instance, the Aeroflo Core is almost completely laid on its side which puts it in a lower RG orientation. When the patterns are short without much hold and urethane isn’t an option, shorter pin-to-PAP distances become the go-to choice. The 2 x 5 x 1.5 layout is an option for players looking for stability. Surface Used on All Balls: 1500-grit Polished I’ve maintained the pin buffer and PSA radii with each of these layouts but adjusted the pin-to-PAP separation across the test balls in 2” increments. For an in-depth analysis of what pin-to-PAP distances represent in bowling ball layout application, be sure to check out Alex Hoskins’ thorough column on the subject here. It’s immensely important to not only look at the innate characteristics built into the balls themselves, but the layouts, most specifically the pin-to-PAP distance, as well. The pin-to-PAP is unquestionably the most influential variable in the layout selection process. I will find the optimal line with each ball/layout and roll similar lines with them to distinguish each ball’s unique layout characteristics. ![]() ![]() For this comparison test, I selected three different layouts each with the same pin buffer and PSA values but differing pin-to-PAP distances. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |